ARMOUR & CO.

v.

WANTOCK ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Armour & Co. v. Wantock, 323 U.S. 126 (U.S. 1944)
  …sleeping or recreation. The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on facts of considerable similarity reached an opposite result, in Skidmore v. Swift & Co., 136 F. 2d 112, post, p. 134. To resolve the conflict we granted certiorari in both cases. 322 U. S. 723. Armour and Company operates a soap factory in Chicago which produces goods for interstate commerce. It maintains a private fire-fighting force to supplement that provided by the city. The respondents were employed as fire fighters only, and otherw…
• Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Central-Illinois Sec. Corp., 338 U.S. 96 (U.S. 1949)
  …further proceedings in accordance with its opinion. Engineers Public Service Co. v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 78 U. S. App. D. C. 199, 138 F. 2d 936. On the applications of both Engineers and the Commission, this Court granted certiorari. 322 U. S. 723. We were prevented by lack of a quorum from deciding the case, and when we were advised that the partial consummation of the plan now under consideration rendered the question moot, we ordered the decision of the Court of Appeals vacated. 332 U. S.…
• Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. New England Elec. Sys., 384 U.S. 176 (U.S. 1966)
  …t of Columbia decision is Philadelphia Co. v. SEC, 85 U. S. App. D. C. 327, 177 F. 2d 720; that court thought it was following its earlier two-to-one decision in Engineers Pub. Serv. Co. v. SEC, 78 U. S. App. D. C. 199, 138 F. 2d 936, cert. granted, 322 U. S. 723, vacated as moot, 332 U. S. 788, but Engineers is ambiguous. Among examples — and I do not mean to approve or disapprove the ones I cite — are SEC rulings that as noted it will not consider losses to the principal system, General Pub. Utils. Corp.,…