UNITED STATES EX REL. POTTS

v.

RABB, U. S. MARSHAL

Citator

Cited By

• Basista v. Weir, 340 F.2d 74 (3d Cir. 1965)
  …is, 300 F. 2d 24 (9 Cir. 1962); Hughes v. Noble, 295 F. 2d 495 (5 Cir. 1961); Brazier v. Cherry, 293 F. 2d 401 (5 Cir. 1961); Coleman v. Johnston, 247 F. 2d 273 (7 Cir. 1957); United States ex rel. Potts v. Rabb, 141 F. 2d 45 (3 Cir.), cert. denied, 322 U.S. 727, 64 S.Ct. 943, 88 L.Ed. 1563 (1944). The trial judge was disturbed that the case at bar may have arisen because of personal animosity between Basista and Scalese. The statutory words “under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or us…
• United States v. Hall, 348 F.2d 837 (2d Cir. 1965)
  …of the individual to be secure in his person against unreasonable arrests, as well as against unreasonable searches of houses and seizure of papers and effects,” see United States ex rel. Potts v. Rabb, 141 F. 2d 45, 46 n. 1 (3 Cir.), cert. denied, 322 U.S. 727, 64 S.Ct. 943, 88 L.Ed. 1563 (1944), and that it “protects against improper seizure of the person as fully as against unreasonable breaking into the close,” Collins v. Beto, 348 F. 2d 823, 832 (5 Cir. 1965) (concurring opinion). See also Giordenel…
• Collins v. Beto, 348 F.2d 823 (5th Cir. 1965)
  …ainst improper seizure of the person as fully as against unreasonable breaking into the close, see Albrecht v. United States, 273 U.S. 1, 5, 47 S.Ct. 250, 71 L.Ed. 505 (1927); United States ex rel. Potts v. Rabb, 141 F. 2d 45 (3 Cir.), cert. denied, 322 U.S. 727, 64 S.Ct. 943, 88 L.Ed. 1563 (1944), and nothing in the Supreme Court’s language would warrant a view that the Fourteenth Amendment “absorbs” the Fourth less in one respect than in the other, see Ker v. State of California, 374 U.S. 23, 83 S.Ct. 162…