CITY OF MILWAUKEE ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. United States, 200 F.2d 908 (2d Cir. 1953)
  …“clearly erroneous,”1 as it must be to justify reversal. Huilever, S. A. Division Huileries Du Congo Beige v. The Otho, 2 Cir., 139 F. 2d 748, 749, certiorari denied American West African Line v. “Huilever” S. A. Division Huileries Du Congo Beige, 322 U.S. 735, 64 S.Ct. 1047, 88 L.Ed. 1569; Artemis Maritime Co. v. Southwestern Sugar & Molasses Co,, supra, 4 Cir., 189 F. 2d at page 494. Decree affirmed.…
• Paul v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 206 F.2d 763 (3d Cir. 1953)
  …not be enough to start the holding period running, even in the case of an already completed building. Helvering v. San Joaquin Fruit & Investment Co.; supra; Howell v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 5 Cir., 140 F. 2d 765, certiorari denied, 1944, 322 U.S. 735, 64 S.Ct 1048, 88 L.Ed. 1569. Moreover, the record shows that as of six months before the sale, petitioner had entered into contracts totaling only $59,000 and had paid out only $28,000 of a total construction cost of about $98,000. Hence, even o…
• United States v. City OF Adair, 539 F.2d 1185 (8th Cir. 1976)
  …ctrine of implied immunity, which can be waived only by congressional consent. See New Brunswick v. United States, 276 U.S. 547, 555, 48 S.Ct. 371, 72 L.Ed. 693 (1928); United States v. City of Milwaukee, 140 F. 2d 286, 288 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 322 U.S. 735, 64 S.Ct. 1047, 88 L.Ed. 1568 (1944); United States v. County of San Diego, 249 F.Supp. 321 (S.D. Cal.1966). We find that the Red River panel did in fact consider the status of the RFC as a government corporation and properly found implied immunity…