LYNBROOK GARDENS, INC.

v.

ULLMAN

Citator

Cited By

• In re Forstner Chain Corp. v. Marvel Jewelry MFG. Co., 177 F.2d 572 (1st Cir. 1949)
  …rly expressed. Counsel for the plaintiff could hardly have been misled by the form of the judgment, for the district judge used substantially the same form in Bellavance v. Frank Morrow Co., Inc., 1 Cir., 1944, 141 F. 2d 378, certiorari denied 1944, 322 U.S. 742, 64 S.Ct. 1144, 88 L.Ed. 1575. That was also a suit for patent infringement in which the opinion of the court [49 F.Supp. 576, 580] concluded with the sentence: “Judgment is, therefore, entered for the defendant for costs”, and on the same day the…
• Utah Junk Co. v. Bowles, 150 F.2d 963 (Emer. Ct. App. 1945)
  …at it was a petition for amendment. In any event persons may not be treated as parties to a protest unless the language of the protest clearly indicates such intention. Cf. Bowman Realty Co. v. Bowles, Em.App., 1944, 140 F. 2d 974, certiorari denied 322 U.S. 742, 64 S.Ct. 1144, 88 L.Ed. 1575. We think complainant has failed to distinguish its situation from that of complainants in the Thomas Paper Stock case. Until and unless our opinion in that caséis overruled, it stands as the controlling law. The com…
• Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Freehill, 202 F.2d 753 (Emer. Ct. App. 1953)
  …d by the court, unless such objection shall have been set forth by the complainant in the protest * * The grounds of protest must be clearly set forth and may not be left to inference. Bowman v. Bowles, Em.App.1944, 140 F. 2d 974, cer-tiorari denied 322 U.S. 742, 64 S.Ct. 1144, 88 L.Ed. 1575. The complainant asserts that it is entitled to relief under Section 402(k) 1 of the Defense Production Act, the so-called Herlong Amendment, which had been added to the act by the Defense Production Act Amendments of…