SULLIVAN

v.

MEYER

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Nagler v. Admiral Corp., 248 F.2d 319 (2d Cir. 1957)
  …rd, 10 Cir., 180 F. 2d 519, 522; Kinnear-Weed Corp. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co., 5 Cir., 214 F. 2d 891, certiorari denied 348 U.S. 912, 75 S.Ct. 292, 99 L.Ed. 715; Beegle v. Thomson, 7 Cir., 138 F. 2d 875, 881, certiorari denied Beegle v. Thompson, 322 U.S. 743, 64 S.Ct. 1143, 88 L.Ed. 1576; Black & Yates v. Mahogany Ass’n, 3 Cir., 129 F. 2d 227, 148 A.L.R. 841, certiorari denied Mahogany Ass’n v. Black & Yates, 317 U.S. 672, 63 S.Ct. 76, 87 L.Ed. 539. See also Resolutions Adopted at Seminar on Long Cases…
• Franchised Stores OF NEW York, Inc. v. Winter, 394 F.2d 664 (2d Cir. 1968)
  …ucceed in a trademark infringement action against one who is still his licensee. See Joseph Bancroft & Sons Co. v. Shelley Knitting Mills, Inc., 212 F.Supp. 715 (E.D. Pa.1962). Cf. Smith v. Dental Products Co., 140 F. 2d 140 (7th Cir.), cert. denied 322 U.S. 743, 64 S.Ct. 1146, 88 L.Ed. 1576 (1944). II. Judge Dooling dismissed the complaint because he felt that Section 1114 required that the alleged infringement actually occur in interstate commerce. We disagree. It is true that prior to the enactment of…
• Denison Mattress Factory v. The Spring-Air Co., 308 F.2d 403 (5th Cir. 1962)
  …ensee acquires only the right to a limited use of the trademark and the control, right and title to the product remains in the licensor. Adam v. Folger, 7 Cir., 120 F. 260 (1903); Smith v. Dental Products Co., 7 Cir., 1944, 140 F. 2d 140, cert. den. 322 U.S. 743, 64 S.Ct. 1146, 88 L.Ed. 1576 (1944) . I. Division of Trade Territory A trademark cannot travel to places where there is no article to bear it and no trader to supply the article. But if the right to use the trademark is not limited to any place,…