WATSON
v.
MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO.; AND WATSON V. MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO.
WATSON
MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO.; AND WATSON V. MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO.
322 U.S. 746
Supreme Court of the United States (1944)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Paulina Castillo v. Ercell Givens, 704 F.2d 181 (5th Cir. 1983)…is employees.” (citing Mitchell v. Reynolds, 125 F.Supp. 337, 340 (W.D.Ark.1954)). Furthermore, an employer must decide at his peril which employees are covered by the Act. George Lawley & Son Corp. v. South, 140 F. 2d 439 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 322 U.S. 746, 64 S.Ct. 1156, 88 L.Ed. 1578 (1944). In Anderson v. Mount Clemens Pottery Co., 328 U.S. 680, 66 S.Ct. 1187, 1192, 90 L.Ed. 1515 (1946), the Supreme Court specified the burden of proof in cases where the employer has failed to maintain the records…