TEKSON

v.

MICHIGAN

Citator

Cited By

• Jordan v. United States Dist. Court FOR THE Dist. OF Columbia, 233 F.2d 362 (D.C. Cir. 1956)
  …he appeal may not be taken, 28 U.S.C. § 1935 (1952), unless the certificate itself is erroneous because a substantial question is in fact presented by appellant. Waterman v. McMillan, 1943, 77 U.S.App.D.C. 310, 135 F. 2d 807, certiorari denied 1944, 322 U.S. 749, 64 S.Ct. 1160, 88 L.Ed. 1599. Under all the circumstances here, including our finding that “at least one substantial question is presented,” we consider that the usual rule does not apply, and that this court can and should act without further dela…
• Gerringer v. United States, 213 F.2d 346 (D.C. Cir. 1954)
  …ad been made in the District Court and (2) the action of the District Court on such a request, if any. In support of its opposition, the Government cited Waterman v. McMillan, 1943, 77 U.S.App.D.C. 310, 135 F. 2d 807. [*348] certiorari denied, 1944, 322 U.S. 749, 64 S.Ct. 1160, 88 L.Ed. 1599. In that case, in interpreting the then applicable statute4 and outlining the procedures to be followed under it, the court stated: On February 19, 1953, this court appointed counsel to represent Gerringer.5 On March…
• West v. United States, 222 F.2d 774 (D.C. Cir. 1954)
  …d been made in the District Court and' (2) the action, if any, of the District Court on such a request. In support of its opposition, the Government cited Waterman v. McMillan, 77 U.S.App.D.C. 310, 135 F. 2d 807 (D.C. Cir., 1943), certiorari denied, 322 U.S. 749, 64 S.Ct. 1160, 88 L.Ed. 1599 (1944). In that case, in interpreting the then applicable statute4 and outlining the procedure to be followed under it the court said: * * * The purpose of the statute is that the application to proceed in forma pauper…