FLETCHER
v.
WOOL ET AL.; FLETCHER V. WILLARD R. COOK & CO., INC. ET AL.; FLETCHER V. D. H. GOODMAN, INC.; FLETCHER V. KRISE, RECEIVER, ET AL.; FLETCHER V. BARRON ET AL.; FLETCHER V. NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE; FLETCHER V. NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE ET AL.; AND FLETCHER V. MAUPIN
FLETCHER
WOOL ET AL.; FLETCHER V. WILLARD R. COOK & CO., INC. ET AL.; FLETCHER V. D. H. GOODMAN, INC.; FLETCHER V. KRISE, RECEIVER, ET AL.; FLETCHER V. BARRON ET AL.; FLETCHER V. NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE; FLETCHER V. NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE ET AL.; AND FLETCHER V. MAUPIN
322 U.S. 749
Supreme Court of the United States (1944)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gerringer v. United States, 213 F.2d 346 (D.C. Cir. 1954)…ad been made in the District Court and (2) the action of the District Court on such a request, if any. In support of its opposition, the Government cited Waterman v. McMillan, 1943, 77 U.S.App.D.C. 310, 135 F. 2d 807. [*348] certiorari denied, 1944, 322 U.S. 749, 64 S.Ct. 1160, 88 L.Ed. 1599. In that case, in interpreting the then applicable statute4 and outlining the procedures to be followed under it, the court stated: On February 19, 1953, this court appointed counsel to represent Gerringer.5 On March…
-
Cash v. United States, 261 F.2d 731 (D.C. Cir. 1958)…dinarily consider a petition for leave to appeal in forma pauperis unless an application for such leave was first made to, and denied by, the District Court. Waterman v. McMillan, 77 U.S.App.D.C. 310, 135 F. 2d 807 (D.C.Cir.1943), certiorari denied, 322 U.S. 749, 64 S.Ct. 1160, 88 L.Ed. 1580 (1944). . Johnson v. United States, supra note 1, 352 U.S. at page 566, 77 S.Ct. at page 550; Farley v. United States, 354 U.S. 521, 523, 77 S.Ct. 1371, 1 L.Ed.2d 1529 (1957). . Oxford English Dictionary (1933); Bouvi…
-
United States v. Farley, 238 F.2d 575 (2d Cir. 1956)…r sufficiency to warrant allowance of an appeal in forma pauperis until an opportunity has been afforded to the trial court to decide whether they are pressed in good faith. Waterman v. McMillan, 77 U.S.App.D.C. 310, 135 F. 2d 807, certiorari denied 322 U.S. 749, 64 S.Ct. 1160, 88 L.Ed. 1599, rehearing denied 323 U.S. 812, 65 S.Ct. 30, 89 L.Ed. 647; Gerringer v. United States, 93 U.S.App.D.C. 403, 213 F. 2d 346; Kyle v. United States, 9 Cir., 199 F. 2d 756. Accordingly we now deny the pending motion, but w…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence