GRAND
v.
MAYO, STATE PRISON CUSTODIAN
GRAND
MAYO, STATE PRISON CUSTODIAN
322 U.S. 766
Supreme Court of the United States (1944)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
McCULLOUGH v. Kammerer Corp., 148 F.2d 525 (9th Cir. 1945)…the license agreement between the appellees was against the public interest and hence that all equitable relief should be denied appellees. Certiorari was denied, 322 U.S. 739, 64 S.Ct. 1056. Later, upon a motion for rehearing, the writ was granted, 322 U.S. 766, 64 S.Ct. 1277. On January 2, 1945, the Supreme Court dismissed the writ and [*526] remanded the case to this court, 323 U.S. 327, 65 S.Ct. 297. In the interim the patent had expired. In this court the appellant, admitting the finality of our judg…
-
McCULLOUGH v. Kammerer Corp., 156 F.2d 343 (9th Cir. 1946)…On appeal here we affirmed, 9 Cir., 138 F. 2d 482, and denied a petition for rehearing, 9 Cir., 143 F. 2d 595. Certiorari to the Supreme Court was sought and denied, 322 U.S. 739, 64 S.Ct. 1056, 88 L.Ed. 1573, but granted on petition for rehearing, 322 U.S. 766, 64 S.Ct. 1277, 88 L.Ed. 1593. The granting of certiorari was to consider the contention of appellant that appellee Kammerer’s license agreement with appellee Baash-Ross contained restrictions, unauthorized by the patent, against public policy and u…