GRAND
v.
MAYO, STATE PRISON CUSTODIAN

U.S. | 1944-06-12
No. 1107
322 U.S. 766 Supreme Court of the United States (1944) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • McCULLOUGH v. Kammerer Corp., 148 F.2d 525 (9th Cir. 1945)
    …the license agreement between the appellees was against the public interest and hence that all equitable relief should be denied appellees. Certiorari was denied, 322 U.S. 739, 64 S.Ct. 1056. Later, upon a motion for rehearing, the writ was granted, 322 U.S. 766, 64 S.Ct. 1277. On January 2, 1945, the Supreme Court dismissed the writ and [*526] remanded the case to this court, 323 U.S. 327, 65 S.Ct. 297. In the interim the patent had expired. In this court the appellant, admitting the finality of our judg…
  • McCULLOUGH v. Kammerer Corp., 156 F.2d 343 (9th Cir. 1946)
    …On appeal here we affirmed, 9 Cir., 138 F. 2d 482, and denied a petition for rehearing, 9 Cir., 143 F. 2d 595. Certiorari to the Supreme Court was sought and denied, 322 U.S. 739, 64 S.Ct. 1056, 88 L.Ed. 1573, but granted on petition for rehearing, 322 U.S. 766, 64 S.Ct. 1277, 88 L.Ed. 1593. The granting of certiorari was to consider the contention of appellant that appellee Kammerer’s license agreement with appellee Baash-Ross contained restrictions, unauthorized by the patent, against public policy and u…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw