TAYLOR ET AL., TRUSTEES OF LAKE PLACID METHODIST CHURCH,

v.

PAYNE, ADMINISTRATRIX

Citator

Cited By

• Shriners Hosps. FOR Crippled Child. v. Zrillic, 563 So. 2d 64 (Fla. 1990)
  …of feudal England. Yet all too often courts have failed to thoroughly analyze the distinction, instead giving unquestioning allegiance to an antiquated way of thinking. See Taylor v. Payne, 154 Fla. 359, 362-63, 17 So. 2d 615, 617, appeal dismissed, 323 U.S. 666, 65 S.Ct. 49, 89 L.Ed. 541 (1944); see also In re Estate of Greenberg, 390 So. 2d 40, 43 (Fla.1980) (following Taylor), appeal dismissed, 450 U.S. 961, 101 S.Ct. 1475, 67 L.Ed.2d 610 (1981); In re Estate of Blankenship, 122 So. 2d 466, 469 (Fla.1960…

  ← 1 / 4 →
• In re Est. of Leo Greenberg, 390 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 1980)
  …te property by last will and testament is not an inherent right of a citizen but rather is one derived from legislation. Efstathion v. Saucer, 158 Fla. 422, 29 So. 2d 304 (1947); Taylor v. Payne, 154 Fla. 359, 17 So. 2d 615 (1944), appeal dismissed, 323 U.S. 666, 65 S.Ct. 49, 89 L.Ed. 647 (1944); In re Sharp’s Estate, 133 Fla. 802, 183 So. 470 (1938). See also Simon, Redfearn Wills and Administration in Florida, 5th edition (1977), section 2.03. Notwithstanding the decision of the federal district court in…
• In re Est. of Iva Neil Blankenship v. J. L. Reed & SON, 122 So. 2d 466 (Fla. 1960)
  …provide that such bequests, were not “ipso facto void but voidable only”' at the election of those who would benefit by causing such bequests to be made void. Taylor v. Payne, 1944, 154 Fla. 359, 17 So. 2d 615, 618, 154 A.L.R. 677, appeal dismissed 323 U.S. 666, 65 S.Ct. 49, 89 L. Ed. 541, rehearing denied 323 U.S. 813, 65 S.Ct. 113, 89 L.Ed. 647. Following the decision in the Pratt case rendered in March 1956, the 1957 session of the legislature amended § 731.19 to’ read as it now does and did at the tim…

Authorities Cited

• Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158 (U.S. 1944)
• Murdock v. Pennsylvania (city of Jeannette), 319 U.S. 105 (U.S. 1943)
• Stebbins and Hurley and Executor of the Will of Watkinson v. Riley, 268 U.S. 137 (U.S. 1925)
• Campbell v. California, 200 U.S. 87 (U.S. 1906)