YLAGAN

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• McALLISTER v. United States, 348 U.S. 19 (U.S. 1954)
  …S. 533; Moor v. Texas & N. O. R. Co., 297 U. S. 101; Texas & New Orleans R. Co. v. Neill, 302 U. S. 645; Goodman v. United States, 305 U. S. 578; Goins v. United States, 306 U. S. 622; McCullough v. Kammerer Corp., 323 U. S. 327; McCarthy v. Bruner, 323 U. S. 673. I would dismiss the writ as improvidently granted. * See Labor Board v. Pittsburgh S. S. Co., 340 U. S. 498, 503: “This is not the place to review a conflict of evidence nor to reverse a Court of Appeals because were we in its place we would fin…
• Ferguson v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc., 352 U.S. 521 (U.S. 1957)
  …appears in quite a different light after argument than it appeared on the original papers. Surely this must be acknowledged regarding one of today’s cases, No. 46, and see McCarthy v. Bruner, certiorari granted, 322 U. S. 718, certiorari dismissed, 323 U. S. 673. The course of argument and the briefs on the merits may disclose that a case appearing on the [*528] surface to warrant a writ of certiorari does not warrant it, see Layne & Bowler Corp. v. Western Well Works, Inc., 261 U. S. 387,5 or may reveal mo…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• THE Monrosa v. Carbon Black Exp., Inc., 359 U.S. 180 (U.S. 1959)
  …United States, 306 U. S. 622; Moor v. Texas & New Orleans R. Co., 297 U. S. 101; Southern Power Co. [*184] v. North Carolina Public Service Co., 263 U. S. 508. Cf. Hammerstein v. Superior Court of California, 341 U. S. 491, 492; McCarthy v. Bruner, 323 U. S. 673; Layne & Bowler Corp. v. Western Well Works, Inc., 261 U. S. 387, 392-393; Tyrrell, v. District of Columbia, 243 U. S. 1. Examination of a case on the merits, on oral argument, may bring into “proper focus” a consideration which, though present in t…