EX PARTE JOHN RUSSELL MILLER; SAXE
v.
HEINZE ET AL.; VERNON V. WYOMING ET AL.; HENDRIN V. LAINSON, WARDEN; AND UNITED STATES EX REL. RUSSELL V. RAGEN, WARDEN, ET AL.
EX PARTE JOHN RUSSELL MILLER; SAXE
HEINZE ET AL.; VERNON V. WYOMING ET AL.; HENDRIN V. LAINSON, WARDEN; AND UNITED STATES EX REL. RUSSELL V. RAGEN, WARDEN, ET AL.
323 U.S. 679
Supreme Court of the United States (1944)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
D. A. Schulte, Inc. v. Gangi, 328 U.S. 108 (U.S. 1946)…suit with prejudice, thereby preventing the employee from seeking to recover more on the same claim.” Settlements of controversies under the Act by stipulated judgments in this Court are also referred to by petitioner. North Shore Corp. v. Barnett, 323 U. S. 679. Petitioner draws the inference that bona fide stipulated judgments on alleged Wage-Hour violations for less than the amounts actually due stand in no better position than bona fide settlements. Even though stipulated judgments may be obtained, whe…