MONAGHAN
v.
ARMATAGE ET AL.
MONAGHAN
ARMATAGE ET AL.
323 U.S. 681
Supreme Court of the United States (1945)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. City of Trenton v. New Jersey, 262 U. S. 182; Risty v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co., 270 U. S. 378, 390; Williams v. Mayor, 289 U. S. 36.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cobo v. O'Bryant, 116 So. 2d 233 (Fla. 1959)…xercise are matters for legislative determination. The view which we have taken here and in prior cases is consistent with decisions in point from other jurisdictions. Monoghan v. Armatage, 1944, 218 Minn. 108, 15 N.W. 2d 241, appeal dismissed 1945, 323 U.S. 681, 65 S.Ct. 436, 89 L.Ed. 552; Town of Bridgie v. County of Koochiching, 1948, 227 Minn. 320, 35 N.W. 2d 537; Orleans Parish School Board v. City of New Orleans, La.App.1952, 56 So. 2d 280. It was pointed out in City of Orlando v. Evans, supra, on re…
Authorities Cited
- City of Trenton v. State of N.J., 262 U.S. 182 (U.S. 1923)
- Risty v. Chicago, 270 U.S. 378 (U.S. 1926)
- Williams v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore, 289 U.S. 36 (U.S. 1933)