SPECIAL EQUIPMENT CO.

v.

COE, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS

Citator

Cited By

• Republic OF Mexico v. Hoffman, 324 U.S. 30 (U.S. 1945)
  …lding on the authority of The Navemar, supra, and The Katingo Hadjipatera, 119 F. 2d 1022, that the Baja California, although owned by the Mexican government, was not immune from suit because not in its possession and service. We granted certiorari, 323 U. S. 697, on a petition which presented the question whether title of the vessel without possession in the Mexican government is sufficient to call for judicial recognition of the asserted immunity. The decisions of the two courts below that the vessel was…
• Special Equip. Co. v. Coe, 324 U.S. 370 (U.S. 1945)
  …subcombination of the elements of a machine for which the inventor had previously filed a patent application. The district court gave judgment for respondent. The Court of Appeals for the District affirmed, 144 F. 2d 497, and we granted certiorari, 323 U. S. 697. The question is whether the Court of Appeals correctly rested its decision upon the ground that petitioner did not intend to make or use the invention and that the purpose of seeking the patent was to exploit and protect the combination invention e…