NORTH DAKOTA

v.

STANTON

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Barber v. Turberville, 218 F.2d 34 (D.C. Cir. 1954)
  …to contest the amount of the damages on the writ of inquiry.” See also Klapprott v. United States, 1949, 335 U.S. 601, 611, 612, 69 S.Ct. 384, 93 L.Ed. 266; Peitzman v. City of Illmo, 8 Cir., 1944, 141 F. 2d 956, 962, 963, certiorari denied, 1944, 323 U.S. 718, 65 S.Ct. 47, 89 L.Ed. 577. Surely, in a case such as this, it is the better practice, if not actually compelled,1 that the issue as to damages be submitted to the jury. Bass v. Hoagland, 5 Cir., 1949, 172 F. 2d 205, certiorari denied, 1949, 338 U.S…
• Bowles v. J. J. Schmitt & Co., Inc., 170 F.2d 617 (2d Cir. 1948)
  …5 (a), whether it is restrictive when there is a default other than for nonappearance. See 3 Moore, Federal Practice, 3159, answering, somewhat reluctantly, in the affirmative, with Peitzman v. City of Illmo, 8 Cir., 141 F. 2d 956, certiorari denied 323 U.S. 718, 65 S.Ct. 47, 89 L.Ed. 577, contra. In the caption to the “Confession” the description of Bowles as “Administrator, Office of Price Administration,” was supplemented with the words “for and on behalf, of the United States,” and the judgment of June…
• Zatina v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 442 F.2d 238 (8th Cir. 1971)
  …omplaint falls within the sound discretion of the trial court. Rule 15(a), Fed.R.Civ.P.; Goldenberg v. World Wide Shippers & Mov. of Chicago, 236 F. 2d 198, 200 (7th Cir. 1956); Peitzman v. City of Illmo, 141 F. 2d 956, 962 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 323 U.S. 718, 65 S.Ct. 47, 89 L.Ed. 577 (1944); see generally 3 Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 15.08[3] (2d ed. 1968). Nor can we say that the district court committed error in the damage award. The amount entered in the judgment also fell within the ambit of discre…