MINNESOTA

v.

TRUSTEES OF HAMLINE UNIVERSITY

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Carman, 577 F.2d 556 (9th Cir. 1978)
  …t here relies heavily, recognized that “taking by fraud” for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 2314 consists of the culmination of a plan “to despoil” the owner of his property. Accord, United States v. Handler, 142 F. 2d 351, 353 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 323 U.S. 741, 65 S.Ct. 40, 89 L.Ed. 594 (1944). United States v. Roselli, 432 F. 2d 879, 891 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 924, 91 S.Ct. 883, 27 L.Ed.2d 828 (1970) is not to the contrary. Its holding that commission of the crimes embraced by 18 U.S.C. § 19…
• Fredrick v. United States, 163 F.2d 536 (9th Cir. 1947)
  …spect of any of the matters embraced by it.” See, also, as to the specific charges of “forging and counterfeiting”, Pines v. United States, 8 Cir., 123 F. 2d 825, 828, 829. Cf. United States v. Handler, 2 Cir., 142 F. 2d 351, 353, certiorari denied, 323 U.S. 741, 65 S.Ct. 40, 89 L.Ed. 594. Finally, the appellants contend that “the information failed to inform the appellants of the nature and the cause of the accusations against them” in that it failed to “identify” the appellants as “retailers”, “wholesale…
• United States v. McCLAIN, 545 F.2d 988 (5th Cir. 1977)
  …The Turley Court cited with approval two National Stolen Property Act cases that had also given the word “stolen” broad scope. See Crabb v. Zerbst, 5 Cir. 1939, 99 F. 2d 562, 565; United States v. Handler, 2 Cir. 1944, 142 F. 2d 351, cert. denied, 323 U.S. 741, 65 S.Ct. 40, 89 L.Ed. 594.6 Both cases held that embezzled property was stolen within the meaning of the Act. In Crabb, we observed that “stealing” is commonly used to denote any dishonest transaction whereby one person obtains that which rightfull…