HERBERT LANE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1965-07-08
No. G-42
WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and STURGIS and CARROLL, DONALD K., JJ., concur.
177 So. 2d 245 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1965) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was consolidated in this court with the case of Phillips v. State, 177 So.2d 243, our file No. G-41, in which our opinion was filed on this date. Appellant Herbert Lane was jointly tried with William Roy Phillips, the appellant in Case No. G-41, upon two informations charging them jointly with the same offenses, as noted in the Phillips opinion.

The only point of law presented by appellant Herbert Lane is the first point discussed in the said Phillips opinion. For the reasons stated in said opinion, to which reference is had, the judgment of the trial court in this case is likewise

Affirmed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and STURGIS and CARROLL, DONALD K., JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Marx Daniel Boim and Clorinda A. Boim v. State, 194 So. 2d 313 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967)
    …rs, the action of the agents in making the search of the area without benefit of a search warrant and as a result of confidential information received by them was not in any sense reprehensible or illegal. Appellant’s first point is without merit.” (177 So. 2d 245) We conclude that even assuming the arrest warrant to have been issued as a result of information obtained incident to the removal of the plant at a time that the officer was technically trespassing, nevertheless, inasmuch as the evidence reveals t…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw