STONEBREAKER
v.
SMYTH, SUPERINTENDENT
STONEBREAKER
SMYTH, SUPERINTENDENT
323 U.S. 754
Supreme Court of the United States (1944)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Stonebreaker v. Smyth, 163 F.2d 498 (4th Cir. 1947)…o the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia for a writ of error, which was denied by that court. Thereupon, petitioner applied to the United States Supreme Court for writ of certiora-ri; and this was denied on October 16, 1944. Stonebreaker v. Smyth, 323 U.S. 754, 65 S.Ct. 81, 89 L.Ed. 603. After a delay of over two years, during which the Supreme Court had decided a number of cases on right to counsel and the effect of pleas of guilty by prisoners without counsel, petitioner, on January 13, 1947, filed the…
-
Crump v. Anderson, 352 F.2d 649 (D.C. Cir. 1965)…him the right to cross-examine, as a matter of practice. But this is quite different from a statutory right. . The decisions of this court do not compel a contrary result. In Neely v. United States, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 177, 144 F. 2d 519, cert. denied, 323 U.S. 754, 65 S.Ct. 83. 89 L.Ed. 604 (1944), we said, that the coroner “sits in a quasi-judicial capacity.” Supra at 178, 144 F. 2d at 520. The issue in that case was whether appellant’s exculpatory statement made at an inquest could be used for impeachment.…
-
Allen v. United States, 202 F.2d 329 (D.C. Cir. 1952)…he said he got from Schomber, or was that just in the pocketbook, if you know? A. That is what he said he got. I don’t know — .” . Section 11-1205, D.C.Code 1940; Neely v. United States, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 177, 144 F. 2d 519, certiorari denied, 1944, 323 U.S. 754, 05 S.Ct. 83, 89 L.Ed. 604. . The following is typical of several statements to the same effect: “Mr. Miller [Allen’s counsel]: May it please Your Honor, we have contended from the beginning and now contend that he didn’t threaten Mm and didn’t ab…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence