SKINNER MANUFACTURING CO.

v.

KELLOGG SALES CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Truck Equip. Serv. Co. v. Fruehauf Corp., 536 F.2d 1210 (8th Cir. 1976)
  …ould be achieved without exact imitation of the drop-center-side wall design of the Corn-husker 800. . Fruehauf relies on Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co., supra, and Skinner Mfg. Co. v. Kellogg Sales Co., 143 F. 2d 895 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 323 U.S. 766, 65 S.Ct. 119, 89 L.Ed. 613 (1944), for the proposition that a particular design or form or a particular name is incapable of acquiring a secondary meaning even through long and exclusive use with a single product. Its reliance is misplaced. In Kell…
• United States ex rel. Dolenz v. Shaughnessy, 206 F.2d 392 (2d Cir. 1953)
  …ealable hold that it can be reversed only for a manifest abuse of discretion. See Jennings v. Murphy, 7 Cir.; 194 F. 2d 35, 38; United States v. Forzano, supra; Skinner Mfg. Co. v. Kellogg Sales Co., 8 Cir., 143 F. 2d 895, 899-900, certiorari denied 323 U.S. 766, 65 S.Ct. 119, 89 L.Ed. 613. . The quoted statement reads as follows: “We are advised by the Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization that such transcripts, exhibits and the reports of investigators are carefully examined by persons assigned…
• Application of Colonial Stores Inc., 394 F.2d 549 (C.C.P.A. 1968)
  …Cir. 1943), (“OATIES” applied to oat cereal); Skinner Mfg. Co. v. General Foods Sales Co., 52 F.Supp. 432 (D.Neb.1943), aff’d, Skinner Mfg. Co. v. Kellogg Sales Co., 143 F. 2d 895 (8th Cir. 1944), cert. denied, Id. v. General Food & Sales Co., Inc., 323 U.S. 766, 89 L.Ed. 613 (1944), (“RAISIN BRAN” applied to cereal); William Wrigley, Jr., Co. v. Grove Co., 161 F. 885 (S.D.N.Y.1908), aff’d, 183 F. 2d 99 (2d Cir. 1910), (“SPEARMINT” applied to chewing gum); we think that the marks there in issue were devoid…