DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

v.

VIGNAU ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• Am. Fid. & Cas. Co. v. ALL Am. BUS Lines, Inc., 190 F.2d 234 (10th Cir. 1951)
  …ended and supplemented by the order substituting Security as the party plaintiff related back to the filing of the original complaint and therefore the claim was not barred by limitation. Isaacks v. Jeffers, 10 Cir., 144 F. 2d 26, certiorari denied, 323 U.S. 781, 65 S.Ct. 270, 89 L.Ed. 624. Complaint is made that the court denied the demand of American for a jury trial. It is said that in its answer to the complaint as amended and supplemented by the order substituting Security as the party plaintiff, Amer…
• Appleton Elec. Co. v. Graves Truck Line, Inc., 635 F.2d 603 (7th Cir. 1980)
  …as not served until three years after the statute of limitations had run. See also Windbrooke Development Corp. v. Environmental Enterprises, Inc. of Florida, 524 F. 2d 461 (5th Cir. 1975); Isaacks v. Jeffers, 144 F. 2d 26 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 323 U.S. 781, 65 S.Ct. 270, 89 L.Ed. 624 (1944); and Reynolds v. Needle, 132 F. 2d 161 (D.C.Cir.1942). In each of the cases cited above, the defendant was named in the complaint. In [*609] contrast to that situation, in Sassi v. Breier, 584 F. 2d 234 (7th Cir.…
• Osborn Levert Caldwell v. Martin Marietta Corp., 632 F.2d 1184 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …on. Moore Co. v. Sid Richardson Carbon & Gas Co., 347 F. 2d 921 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 925, 86 S.Ct. 927, 15 L.Ed.2d 845 (1965); Mohler v. Miller, 235 F. 2d 153 (6th Cir. 1956); Isaacks v. Jeffers, 144 F. 2d 26 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 323 U.S. 781, 65 S.Ct. 270, 89 L.Ed. 624 (1944). In Moore, the Eighth Circuit persuasively discussed the practical and historical reasons for interpreting Rule 3 as requiring no more than the filing of a complaint to commence an action. The Moore Court noted th…