BRADLEY

v.

BRADLEY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Silva v. Romney, 473 F.2d 287 (1st Cir. 1973)
  …the injury to the developer if the injunction issues, Pauls v. Secretary of the Air Force, 457 F. 2d 294 (1st Cir. 1972) — though this may not be controlling, see Buscaglia v. District Court of San Juan, 145 F. 2d 274 (1st Cir. 1944), cert. denied, 323 U.S. 793, 65 S.Ct. 434, 89 L.Ed. 632 (1945). Having decided the case on these grounds we need not address appellants’ persuasive alternative argument that the district court might have acted, independent of [*293] NEPA, under the All Writs Act, 28 U. S.C. §…
• O'Brien v. Elder, 250 F.2d 275 (5th Cir. 1957)
  …lling short of the policy requirements, has done everything reasonably within his power to accomplish the change, leaving only ministerial details to be performed It' e company (see Bradley v. United States, 10 Cir., 143 F. 2d 573, certiorari denied 323 U.S. 793, 65 S.Ct. 429, 89 L.Ed. 632). We must agree with the trial court that as a matter of law this principle does not apply here. Plaintiff offered to prove that in conversations before his divorce, the insured had stated that of three alternative set…
• Shapiro v. United States, 166 F.2d 240 (2d Cir. 1948)
  …m No. 41 to change his beneficiary just as Shapiro did in the case at bar. The defendant-appellant relies on the opinion of Judge Murrah, speaking for the majority of the court, in Bradley v. United States, 10 Cir., 143 F. 2d 573, certiorari denied, 323 U.S. 793, 65 S.Ct. 429, 89 L.Ed. 632, from which Judge Phillips dissented. In the later decision by the Circuit Court of Appeals of the Tenth Circuit in Collins v. United States, supra, Bradley v. United States was distinguished on the facts. Each decision d…