FIRE ASSOCIATION OF PHILADELPHIA, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
O. W. CLAYTON AND MATILDA R. BOYD, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR

Fla. | 1930-07-26
Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J., concur.
100 Fla. 314 Florida Supreme Court (1930) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Swindal v. City of Jacksonville, 119 Fla. 338 (Fla. 1935)
    …s favor by the prior decisions of this Court. (See City of Tallahassee v. Kaufman, 87 Fla. 119, 100 Sou. Rep. 150; Maxwell v. City of Miami, 87 Fla. 107, 100 Sou. Rep. 147, 33 A. L. R. 682; Tarpon Springs Lbr. & Supply Co. v. City of Tarpon Springs, 100 Fla. 314, 129 Sou. Rep. 609; Chardkoff Junk Co. v. City of Tampa, 102 Fla. 501, 135 Sou. Rep. 457; City of West Palm Beach v. Grimmett, 102 Fla. 680, 136 Sou. Rep. 320, 127 Sou. Rep. 385), and that on the authority of the principles of law set forth and appr…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw