WATKINS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• N. Am. Co. v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, 327 U.S. 686 (U.S. 1946)
  …ities & Exchange Commission, 119 F. 2d 730, cert, denied, 314 U. S. 618; Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Securities & Exchange Commission, 127 F. 2d 378, affirmed on rehearing by equally divided court, 139 F. 2d 298, affirmed by equally divided Court, 324 U. S. 826. See Federal Trade Commission Report, supra, note 3, p. 347. “Sec. 11. (a) . . . “(b) It shall be the duty of the Commission, as soon as practicable after January 1, 1938: “(1) To require by order, after notice and opportunity for hearing, that…
• In re Commonwealth & S. Corp., 184 F.2d 81 (3d Cir. 1950)
  …has the function of appraising conflicting and circumstantial evidence, and the weight and credibility of testimony’. The rules quoted are applicable here.” Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. S.E.C., 9 Cir., 127 F. 2d 378, 384, 139 F. 2d 298, affirmed at 324 U. S. 826, 65 S.Ct. 855, 89 L.Ed. 1394. Appellant insists that the SEC refused to recognize what she calls the “trading value” or “premium value” of the warrants. This value is based, says appellant, on the perpetual call feature of the warrants, warrant hol…