BARLOW ET AL.
v.
UTAH

U.S. | 1945-04-02
No. 1037
324 U.S. 829 Supreme Court of the United States (1945) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Davis v. Beason, 133 U. S. 333; Reynolds v. United States, 98 U. S. 145.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Royston E. Potter v. Murray City, 760 F.2d 1065 (10th Cir. 1985)
    …reme Court of Utah observed some time ago that there has been no attempt to change the State’s laws, “[n]or is such attempt likely.” State v. Barlow, 107 Utah 292, 153 P. 2d 647, 654 (1944), appeal dismissed for want of substantial federal question, 324 U.S. 829, 65 S.Ct. 916, 89 L.Ed. 1396 (1945) (per curiam).4 In sum, the plaintiff’s claim based on the equal footing doctrine lacks merit. B. The Free Exercise Clause In Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. (8 Otto) 145, 25 L.Ed. 244 (1878), the Supreme Cou…
    1 / 2

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw