CALIFORNIA SHIPBUILDING CORP.

v.

INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Wilkerson v. McCARTHY, 336 U.S. 53 (U.S. 1949)
  …nwood, 332 U. S. 773. Lasagna v. McCarthy, 332 U. S. 829. Trust Co. of Chicago v. Erie R. Co., 334 U. S. 845. B. Where lower court sustained a jury verdict for the employer: Barry v. Reading Co., 324 U. S. 867. Benton v. St. Louis-S. F. R. Co., 324 U. S. 843. Benson v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co., 332 U. S. 830. C. Where lower court reversed a jury verdict for the employee and directed a new trial: Owens v. Union P. R. Co., 323 U. S. 740. [*73] II. Cases in which certiorari was denied — Continued. D…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Everett v. S. Pac. Co., 181 F.2d 58 (9th Cir. 1950)
  …ion by other Federal Employers Liability Cases”. Citing Barry v. Reading Co., 3 Cir., 147 F. 2d 129, certiorari denied, 324 U.S. 867, 65 S.Ct. 912, 89 L.Ed. 1422; Benton v. St. Louis-San Francisco R. Co., Mo. Sup., 182 S.W. 2d 61, certiorari denied, 324 U.S. 843, 65 S.Ct. 676, 89 L.Ed. 1405. A jurys verdict is entitled to the same respect regardless of whether it be returned for plaintiff or for defendant, whether for employee or employer. If the jury, as it had a right to do, disbelieved plaintiff it did…