UNITED STATES

v.

ANGLIN & STEVENSON ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (29 total)

• S. END Improvement Grp., Inc. v. Mulliken, 602 So. 2d 1327 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)
  …p.3d 1058 (1983) (a trust beneficiary has standing to maintain a derivative action under California law even though he is not the record or legal owner of any shares); Hurt v. Cotton States Fertilizer Co., 145 F. 2d 293 (5th Cir.1944), cert. denied, 324 U.S. 844, 65 S.Ct. 679, 89 L.Ed. 1406 (1945) (a residuary legatee under a will disposing of corporate stock had a sufficient equitable interest to qualify as a "stockholder" for the purpose of bringing a derivative action notwithstanding that the executor re…
• Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Scandia OF Hialeah, Inc., 414 So. 2d 533 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
  …may be based on profit expectancies, where such expected profits are not based on speculation but on real circumstances. [*535] See, e.g., General Insurance Company of America v. Pathfinder Petroleum Co., 145 F. 2d 368 (9th Cir. 1944), cert. denied, 324 U.S. 844, 65 S.Ct. 679, 89 L.Ed. 1406 (1945); Fidelity-Phenix Fire Insurance Company of New York v. Benedict Coal Corp., 64 F. 2d 347 (4th Cir. 1933), cert. denied, 289 U.S. 762, 53 S.Ct. 795, 77 L.Ed. 1505 (1933); Puget Sound Lumber Company v. Mechanics’ &…
• Polly Ann Barber v. Kimbrell's, Inc., 577 F.2d 216 (4th Cir. 1978)
  …e trial court’s judgment unless under all of the facts and circumstances it is clearly wrong.’ ” Lea v. Cone Mills Corp., 467 F. 2d 277, 279 (4 Cir. 1972), quoting United States v. Anglin & Stevenson, 145 F. 2d 622, 630 (10 Cir. 1944), cert. denied, 324 U.S. 844, 65 S.Ct. 678, 89 L.Ed. 1405. Yet, as this statement clearly implies, appellate review, while necessarily limited in scope, is nonetheless available to insure that the trial court’s discretion has not been abused. We cannot afford effective appellat…