DOLLERT ET AL.

v.

PRATT-HEWIT OIL CORP. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Smith, 206 F.2d 905 (3d Cir. 1953)
  …rime presently involved was not committed or perhaps even contemplated when the answer was given. United States v. Swift, D.C.N.D.Ill.1911, 186 F. 1002; People v. Woodson, 1944, 309 Mich. 391, 15 N.W. 2d 679, 157 A.L.R. 419; certiorari denied, 1945, 324 U.S. 853, 65 S.Ct. 713, 89 L.Ed. 1413. Thus, defendant was not immune from prosecution for the offenses charged in counts two to seven even if the revenue agents did have access to and use the information given by defendant at the hearing in April of 1946.…
• Jackson v. Vance, 179 F.2d 154 (10th Cir. 1949)
  …P. 2d 889; Muellenberg v. Joblinski, 188 Minn. 398, 247 N.W. 570; Langston v. Nash, 192 Ga. 427, 15 S.E. 2d 481; Wolfe County v. Tolson, 283 Ky. 11, 140 S.W. 2d 671; Dollert v. Pratt-Hewit Oil Corp., Tex.Civ.App., 179 S.W. 2d 346, certiorari denied 324 U.S. 853, 65 S.Ct. 713, 89 L.Ed. 1412; Florida Nat. Bank of Jacksonville v. Kassewitz, 156 Fla. 761, 25 So. 2d 271. The appeal insofar as it relates to the order entered on October 25, 1948, is dismissed. The order entered on February 15, 1949, is affirmed…