KING

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Spinelli v. United States, 382 F.2d 871 (8th Cir. 1967)
  …bility of [*893] the evidence. Only if the remoteness destroys the probative worth of the evidence, need it be rejected, and this is a matter left to the discretion of the trial court. King v. United States, 144 F. 2d 729 (8 Cir. 1944), cert. denied 324 U.S. 854, 65 S.Ct.711, 89 L.Ed. 1413. We do not believe we can say as a matter of law that the passage of seven months places the prior activity at a time so remote that it destroys the probative value of the evidence to a degree that the trial court abused…
• United States v. Calvert, 523 F.2d 895 (8th Cir. 1975)
  …t should give a limiting instruction, informing the jury of the narrow purpose for which it has been admitted. See Goodman v. United States, 273 F. 2d 853, 857 (8th Cir. 1960); King v. United States, 144 F. 2d 729, 732 (8th Cir. 1944), cert. denied, 324 U.S. 854, 65 S.Ct. 711, 89 L.Ed. 1413 (1945). We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the disputed evidence. The testimony of Hintz, Beck, Held and Baker, concerning the defendant’s business negotiations with the latter th…
• United States v. Leviton, 193 F.2d 848 (2d Cir. 1951)
  …. But the circumstances out of which they grew were too neatly akin to those covered in the indictment to say that such evidence was incompetent on the issues of design and intent here. King v. United States, 8 Cir., 144 F. 2d 729, certiorari denied 324 U.S. 854, 65 S.Ct. 711, 89 L.Ed. 1413; Harper v. United States, 8 Cir., 143 F. 2d 795; Silkworth v. United States, 2 Cir., 10 F. 2d 711, 720, certiorari denied 271 U.S. 664, 46 S.Ct. 475, 70 L.Ed. 1139; 2 Wig-more on Evidence §§ 301, 304, 3d Ed. 1940; 3 Vand…