ANDERSON, RECEIVER,

v.

TWAY

Citator

Cited By

• Frank R. Jelleff, Inc. v. Blanche K. Braden, 233 F.2d 671 (D.C. Cir. 1956)
  …ermitted to offer such explanation as was pertinent. The trial judge left to the jury the question of what weight might be given to the pleadings. We need go no farther. Cf. Anderson v. Tway, 6 Cir., 1944, 143 F. 2d 95, 100, certiorari denied, 1945, 324 U.S. 861, 65 S.Ct. 865, 89 L.Ed. 1418. The Sixth Circuit in Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Tucker, 1954, 211 F. 2d 325, 334, read Fuller v. King, supra, as holding that pleadings “later withdrawn” are not admissible. . At this point, the jury was told: “The Cour…
• The A. H. Emery Co. v. Marcan Prods. Corp., 389 F.2d 11 (2d Cir. 1968)
  …ge that knowledge of the oath’s contents be imputed to Tate for the purpose of application of the unclean hands doctrine. Cf. Ives v. Sargent, 7 S.Ct. 436, 30 L.Ed. 544, 119 U.S. 652 (1887); Anderson v. Tway, 143 F. 2d 95 (6 Cir. 1944), cert. denied 324 U.S. 861, 65 S.Ct. 865, 89 L.Ed. 1418 (1945). The argument has considerable force and, had the trial court been faced with the necessity of passing upon the effect of such negligence on the plaintiff’s claim of patent infringement, it would have furnished…
• Jungersen v. Baden, 166 F.2d 807 (2d Cir. 1948)
  …self unimportant. Western States Mach. Co. v. S. S. Hepworth Co., 2 Cir., 147 F. 2d 345, 350, certiorari denied 325 U.S. 873, 65 S.Ct. 1414, 89 L.Ed. 1991; Condenser Corp. of America v. Micamold Radio Corp., 2 Cir., 145 F. 2d 878, certiorari denied 324 U. S. 861, 65 S.Ct. 869, 89 L.Ed. 1418. The combination of such known elements is not invention. Toledo Pressed Steel Co. v. Standard Parts, 307 U.S. 350, 355, 356, 59 S.Ct. 897, 83 L.Ed. 1334; Textile Mach. Works v. Louis Hirsch Textile Machines, 302 U.S. 4…