CALLOWAY, TRUSTEE,
v.
HART
CALLOWAY, TRUSTEE,
HART
324 U.S. 866
Supreme Court of the United States (1945)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 11 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Swilley v. Econ. Cab Co. of Jacksonville, 46 So.2d 173 (Fla. 1950)
-
Moore-McCORMACK Lines, Inc. v. Richardson, 295 F.2d 583 (2d Cir. 1961)…lvania R. R. Co., 2 Cir., 1948, 164 F. 2d 21, 23, 1 A.L.R.2d 475, affirmed on other grounds, 1948, 334 U.S. 304, 68 S.Ct. 1039, 92 L.Ed. 1403, with President & Directors of Manhattan Co. v. Kelby, 2 Cir., 1945, 147 F. 2d 465, certiorari denied 1945, 324 U.S. 866, 65 S.Ct. 916, 89 L.Ed. 1422; see also Powers v. New York Central R. R. Co., 2 Cir., 1958, 251 F. 2d 813, 76 A.L.R.2d 1207; Murphy v. Lehigh Valley R. R. Co., 2 Cir., 1946, 158 F. 2d 481; Louisiana & Arkansas R. R. Co. v. Pratt, supra, note 10; Clev…
-
Chem. Bank & Tr. Co. v. Prudence-Bonds Corp. (new Corp.), 207 F.2d 67 (2d Cir. 1953)…the outstanding Prudence-Bonds of this series. We had occasion to define what constituted such an excess under an essentially similar release clause in President and Directors of Manhattan Co. v. Kelby, 2 Cir., 147 F. 2d 465, 470, certiorari denied 324 U.S. 866, 65 S.Ct. 916, 89 L.Ed. 1422. We there said: “In this context, the word ‘excess’ means the amount by which (a), (b) and (c) securities not in default, taken at their face value, plus cash and (d) and (e) securities, taken at their then market value,…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence