WRAGG

v.

FEDERAL LAND BANK OF NEW ORLEANS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Kyriakos v. Goulandris, 151 F.2d 132 (2d Cir. 1945)
  …lt was the consequence of action taken in discharge of his duty. We think that the reasoning in O’Donnell v. Great Lakes Co., 318 U.S. 36, 63 S.Ct. 488, 87 L.Ed. 596, and Marceau v. Great Lakes Transit Corp., 2 Cir., 146 F. 2d 416, certiorari denied 324 U.S. 872, 65 S.Ct. 1018, supports this result and that it made no difference that libellant was at the time on shore. As was said by Stone, C. J., in the first of these two decisions, 318 U.S. at page 42, 63 S.Ct. at page 492, 87 L.Ed. 596: “The right of re…
• Kaufman & Broad Home Sys., Inc. v. Int'l Bhd. OF Firemen & Oilers, AFL-CIO, 607 F.2d 1104 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …rnational Union of Operating Engineers v. Dahlem Construction Co., 6 Cir., 1951, 193 F. 2d 470; Texoma Natural Gas Co. v. Oil Workers International Union, Local No. 463, N.D.Tex., 1943, 58 F.Supp. 132, aff’d 5 Cir., 1944, 146 F. 2d 62, cert. denied, 324 U.S. 872, 65 S.Ct. 1017, 89 L.Ed. 1426 (1945); United Steel Workers v. Shakespeare Co., W.D.Mich., 1949, 84 F.Supp. 267; Mountain States Division No. 17 v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co., D.Colo., 1948, 81 F.Supp. 397. The Company asserts that th…
• Harney v. William M. Moore Bldg. Corp. & Lopier Constr. Corp., 359 F.2d 649 (2d Cir. 1966)
  …laim under the Longshoremen’s Act see Oliver v. Ocean Drilling & Exploration Co., 222 F.Supp. 843 (W.D.La.1963) and Wilkes, supra; on filing a state claim see Biggs, supra, and Marceau v. Great Lakes Transit Corp., 146 F. 2d 416 (2 Cir.), cert. den. 324 U.S. 872, 65 S.Ct. 1018, 89 L.Ed. 1426 (1945). When filing a claim is followed by the acceptance of benefits, it has been held that the claimant may sue under the Jones Act. Boyles v. Humble Oil & Refining Co., 209 F.Supp. 857 (E.D.La.1962); Robertson v. Don…