COPPERWELD STEEL CO.

v.

INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION

Citator

Cited By

• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bell Aircraft Corp., 206 F.2d 235 (2d Cir. 1953)
  …or’s award a justification, since it was no more than an interpretation of a private contract which could not curtail the power of the Board to enforce the statute, N. L. R. B. v. Walt Disney Productions, 9 Cir., 146 F. 2d 44, 48, certiorari denied 324 U.S. 877, 65 S.Ct. 1025, 89 L.Ed. 1429. So it is clear that in enforcing the clause in the contract and causing the denial of Finch’s promotion the union violated Sectiou 8(b)(1)(A). .Similarly, the employer violated Section 8(a)(1). It is true tiat it did…
• The Frostie Co. v. DR. Pepper Co., 361 F.2d 124 (5th Cir. 1966)
  …riam); United States v. Dogan, 314 F. 2d 767, 772 (5th Cir. 1963); Detroit Football Co. v. Robinson, 283 F. 2d 657, 659 (5th Cir. 1960); Dr. William Howard Hay Foundation v. Safety Harbor Sanatorium, 145 F. 2d 661, 663 (5th Cir. 1944), cert. denied, 324 U.S. 877, 65 S.Ct. 1024, 89 L.Ed. 1429 (1945). . Indeed the Lanham Act specifically provides for this. See 15 U.S.C. Sec. 1116: The several courts vested with jurisdiction of civil actions arising under this chapter shall have power to grant injunctions, ac…
• Martini v. Porter, 157 F.2d 35 (9th Cir. 1946)
  …umed the commodities in the course of trade or business within the purview of § 205(e) of the Act. Cf. Bowles v. Trul-linger, 9 Cir., 152 F. 2d 191; Bowles v. Rogers, 7 Cir., 149 F. 2d 1010; Speten v. Bowles, 8 Cir., 146 F. 2d 602, certiorari denied 324 U.S. 877, 65 S.Ct. 1023, 89 L.Ed. 1429; Bowles v. Jones, 10 Cir., 151 F. 2d 232; Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co., 5 Cir., 145 F. 2d 482, reversed on other grounds, 325 U.S. 410, 65 S.Ct. 1215, 89 L.Ed. 1700. Appellants also contend that the action for da…