BYRA
v.
NEW JERSEY; DAULLEY V. RAGEN, WARDEN; AND ADKISON V. RAGEN, WARDEN
BYRA
NEW JERSEY; DAULLEY V. RAGEN, WARDEN; AND ADKISON V. RAGEN, WARDEN
324 U.S. 884
Supreme Court of the United States (1945)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States ex rel. Arthur Dorey v. State OF NEW Jersey & Ann Klein, 560 F.2d 584 (3d Cir. 1977)…422, 120 A. 2d 89 (1956); State v. Mack, 131 N.J.Super. 542, 330 A. 2d 631 (1974); State v. Slocum, 130 N.J.Super. 358, 327 A. 2d 244 (1974); State v. Byra, 128 N.J.L. 429, 26 A. 2d 702 (1942), aff'd 129 N.J.L. 384, 30 A. 2d 49 (1943), cert. denied, 324 U.S. 884, 65 S.Ct. 1025, 89 L.Ed. 1434 (1944). Applying those precedents to the case at bar results in no unfairness or violation of due process. The defense’s efforts focused completely on denial of participation — not on the occurrence of the crime which…
-
United States v. Town OF Clarksville, 224 F.2d 712 (4th Cir. 1955)…on condemnation. Albrecht v. United States, 329 U. S. 599, 67 S.Ct. 606, 91 L.Ed. 532; Muschany v. United States, 324 U.S. 49, 65 S.Ct. 442, 89 L.Ed. 744; United States v. Two Acres of Land More or Less, 7 Cir., 144 F. 2d 207, certiorari dismissed, 324 U.S. 884, 65 S.Ct. 711, 89 L.Ed. 1434. Such an agreement will not be disturbed by the courts except in unusual circumstances. Such circumstances do not exist here. Clarksville and the Government stipulated that the Government would, if it were determined to…