ANDREW L. KENNEDY, ETC., ET AL., APPELLANTS,

v.

FORD R. VANDINE ET AL., APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Bosem v. Arie Lionel Bosem, 279 So. 2d 863 (Fla. 1973)
  …he death of the father. Such provisions are often a part of property settlement agreements but they may not be imposed by the trial judge.” Bosem v. Bosem, 269 So. 2d 758, p. 763, (Fla.App.3d, 1972). The District Court relies on Fleming v. Fleming, 177 So. 2d 384 (Fla.App.3d, 1965), as authority for the proposition that the trial judge is not empowered to require that the divorced father take out life insurance on his life to guarantee that the children will receive the support to which the chancellor has fo…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Blum v. Blum, 382 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
  …husband to maintain life insurance in the light of the other provisions of the revised judgment and the principles stated in Lindley v. Lindley, 84 So. 2d 17 (Fla. 1955); Waskin v. Waskin, 346 So. 2d 1060 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); and Fleming v. Fleming, 177 So. 2d 384 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965), cert, denied, 183 So. 2d 214 (Fla.1965).12 Upon remand, the court is directed to provide for the transfer of the two-door car to Dr. Blum, and to eliminate the provision for college education for the children. II The issues rai…
• Waskin v. Waskin, 346 So. 2d 1060 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
  …1973); and Riley v. Riley, 131 So. 2d 491 (Fla. 1st DCA 1961). However, there is nothing in the law that requires a husband to maintain insurance for his wife or children unless special circumstances dictate its advisability. See Fleming v. Fleming, 177 So. 2d 384 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965). We hold that in view of the relative youth of the parties and the altogether reasonable likelihood that Dr. Waskin will continue to earn large amounts of money in his profession, it was not error for the trial judge to refuse to…

Authorities Cited

• Greenberg v. Greenberg, 101 So. 2d 608 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958)
• Hennig v. Hennig, 162 So. 2d 288 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)
• Bankruptcy v. Commercial Inv. Tr., 103 Fla. 609 (Fla. 1931)