TWISP MINING & SMELTING CO.
v.
CHELAN MINING CO. ET AL.
TWISP MINING & SMELTING CO.
CHELAN MINING CO. ET AL.
325 U.S. 837
Supreme Court of the United States (1945)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. § 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended, 28 U. S. C. § 344 (a). The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Puerto RICO Tel. Co. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 553 F.2d 694 (1st Cir. 1977)…ception to its completion” and that “wire communication within the meaning of the Communications Act [does not end] at the PBX board . .” United States v. AT&T, 57 F.Supp. 451, 454-55 (S.D.N.Y.1944), aff’d mem. sub nom. Hotel Astor v. United States, 325 U.S. 837, 65 S.Ct. 1401, 89 L.Ed. 1964 (1945). This conclusion, we think, requires us to hold that § 201(b) vests the FCC with jurisdiction to determine the reasonableness of PRTC’s attempt to dictate the terms on which PBX subscribers might obtain and use t…