MCCOY

v.

HUNTER, WARDEN; WELCH V. BRADY, WARDEN; AND BLAKE V. BRADY, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 331 U.S. 416 (U.S. 1947)
  …the judgment below and remanded the cause to the Circuit Court of Appeals “for further consideration of the alleged changed circumstances with respect to the demilitarization of the employees involved, and the effect thereof on the Board’s orders.” 325 U. S. 838. [*421] The Board and the respondent then entered into a stipulation relative to the dates and circumstances of the demilitarization of the guards. From this stipulation it appeared that the qualifications, strength, functions and duties of the guar…
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. E. C. Atkins & Co., 331 U.S. 398 (U.S. 1947)
  …d the judgment below and remanded the case to the Circuit Court of Appeals “for further consideration of the alleged changed circumstances with respect to the demilitarization of the employees involved, and the effect thereof on the Board’s orders.” 325 U. S. 838. The Board and the respondent entered into a stipulation relative to the dates and circumstances of the demilitarization of the guards. The stipulation noted that most of the guards had been released from service and that only eleven of them had be…
• Lawrence and next friend v. Chater, 516 U.S. 163 (U.S. 1996)
  …nistrative reinterpretations of federal statutes, see, e. g., Schmidt v. Espy, 513 U. S. 801 (1994), new state statutes, see, e. g., Louisiana v. Hays, 512 U. S. 1230 (1994), changed factual circumstances, see, e.g., NLRB v. Federal Motor Truck Co., 325 U. S. 838 (1945) (demilitarization of employees), and confessions of error or other positions newly taken by the Solicitor General, see, e.g., Wells v. United States, 511 U. S. 1050 (1994); Reed v. United States, 510 U. S. 1188 (1994); Ramirez v. United State…