NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
v.
FEDERAL MOTOR TRUCK CO.; NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD V. JONES & LAUGHLIN STEEL CORP.; AND NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD V. E. C. ATKINS & CO.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
FEDERAL MOTOR TRUCK CO.; NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD V. JONES & LAUGHLIN STEEL CORP.; AND NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD V. E. C. ATKINS & CO.
325 U.S. 838
Supreme Court of the United States (1945)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The petition for writs of certiorari is granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the respective Circuit Courts of Appeals for further consideration of the alleged changed circumstances with respect to the demilitarization of the employee's involved, and the effect thereof on the Board’s orders.
Assistant Solicitor General Cox and Mr. Alvin J. Rockwell for petitioner. Mr. Percy J. Donovan for respondent in No. 1236.
Messrs. William A. Seifert and John C. Bane, Jr. for respondent in No. 1237.
Messrs. Roscoe Pound and Kurt F. Pantzer for respondent in No. 1238.
Reported below: Nos. 1236 and 1237,146 F. 2d 718; No. 1238,147 F. 2d 730.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 331 U.S. 416 (U.S. 1947)…the judgment below and remanded the cause to the Circuit Court of Appeals “for further consideration of the alleged changed circumstances with respect to the demilitarization of the employees involved, and the effect thereof on the Board’s orders.” 325 U. S. 838. [*421] The Board and the respondent then entered into a stipulation relative to the dates and circumstances of the demilitarization of the guards. From this stipulation it appeared that the qualifications, strength, functions and duties of the guar…
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. E. C. Atkins & Co., 331 U.S. 398 (U.S. 1947)…d the judgment below and remanded the case to the Circuit Court of Appeals “for further consideration of the alleged changed circumstances with respect to the demilitarization of the employees involved, and the effect thereof on the Board’s orders.” 325 U. S. 838. The Board and the respondent entered into a stipulation relative to the dates and circumstances of the demilitarization of the guards. The stipulation noted that most of the guards had been released from service and that only eleven of them had be…
-
Lawrence and next friend v. Chater, 516 U.S. 163 (U.S. 1996)…nistrative reinterpretations of federal statutes, see, e. g., Schmidt v. Espy, 513 U. S. 801 (1994), new state statutes, see, e. g., Louisiana v. Hays, 512 U. S. 1230 (1994), changed factual circumstances, see, e.g., NLRB v. Federal Motor Truck Co., 325 U. S. 838 (1945) (demilitarization of employees), and confessions of error or other positions newly taken by the Solicitor General, see, e.g., Wells v. United States, 511 U. S. 1050 (1994); Reed v. United States, 510 U. S. 1188 (1994); Ramirez v. United State…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 146 F.2d 718 (6th Cir. 1944)
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. E. C. Atkins & Co., 147 F.2d 730 (7th Cir. 1945)