APPROVED DEHYDRATING CO., INC.
v.
GOLDEN EAGLE FARM PRODUCTS, INC.
APPROVED DEHYDRATING CO., INC.
GOLDEN EAGLE FARM PRODUCTS, INC.
325 U.S. 868
Supreme Court of the United States (1945)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Woodward v. Commissioner OF Internal Revenue, 410 F.2d 313 (8th Cir. 1969)…iculty with the phrase, “property held for the production of income,” that is present here. The first case relied upon by the taxpayers is Heller v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 2 T.C. 371 (1943), aff’d, 147 F. 2d 376 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 325 U.S. 868, 65 S.Ct. 1405, 89 L.Ed. 1987 (1945). There the taxpayer, a dissenting shareholder, demanded the cash value of his shares rather than the stock of another corporation in a corporate acquisition. He instituted litigation pursuant to the California co…
-
Hurd v. Hodge, 162 F.2d 233 (D.C. Cir. 1947)…d 271 U.S. 323, 46 S.Ct. 521, 70 L.Ed. 969; Russell v. Wallace, 58 App.D.C. 357, 30 F. 2d 981, certiorari denied, 279 U.S. 871, 49 S.Ct. 512, 73 L.Ed. 1007; Mays v. Burgess, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 343, 147 F. 2d 869, 871, 162 A.L.R. 168, certiorari denied, 325 U.S. 868, 65 S.Ct. 1406, 89 L.Ed. 1987, rehearing denied 325 U.S. 896, 65 S.Ct. 1567, 89 L.Ed. 2006. The appellants here have presented no contention that is not answered by those decisions. Thus, what we said in Mays v. Burgess when it was before us for t…1 / 2