MASSACHUSETTS ET AL.
v.
NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN & HARTFORD RAILROAD CO.; AND CHAPIN ET AL., EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR INSTITUTIONAL GROUP, V. NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN & HARTFORD RAILROAD CO. ET AL.
MASSACHUSETTS ET AL.
NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN & HARTFORD RAILROAD CO.; AND CHAPIN ET AL., EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FOR INSTITUTIONAL GROUP, V. NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN & HARTFORD RAILROAD CO. ET AL.
325 U.S. 884
Supreme Court of the United States (1945)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 15 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (14 total)
-
New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S. 392 (U.S. 1970)…determination [of the validity of a plan of reorganization] is a finding of fact... as to the value of the debtor’s property.” In re New York, N. H. & H. R. Co., 147 F. 2d 40, 49, cert. denied sub nom. Massachusetts v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co., 325 U. S. 884. See 5 Collier, supra, ¶77.14, at 538-539; cf. Consolidated Rock Prods. Co. v. Du Bois, 312 U. S., 510, 524-525; First National Bank v. Flershem, 290 U. S. 504, 527; Second Supplemental Report, 331 I. C. C., at 652. In short, with identical issues…
-
Old Colony Bondholders v. New York, 161 F.2d 413 (2d Cir. 1947)…was not premature. III. Appeal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The contentions raised by this appellant require no separate discussion. They either repeat objections which we overruled on the prior appeal, 147 F. 2d 40, 51, certiorari denied 325 U.S. 884, 65 S.Ct. 1577, 89 L.Ed. 1999, or make common cause with the other appellants with respect to matters dealt with in our discussion of their appeals. The orders appealed from are affirmed. New Haven filed its petition for reorganization on October…1 / 2
-
In re Yale Express Sys., Inc. v. Nogg, 362 F.2d 111 (2d Cir. 1966)
Previewing 3 of 14 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence