TWENTIETH CENTURY ASSOCIATES, INC.
v.
WALDMAN
TWENTIETH CENTURY ASSOCIATES, INC.
WALDMAN
326 U.S. 696
Supreme Court of the United States (1946)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The appeal is dismissed for the reason that it was not properly allowed. Rule 36, 28 IT. S. C. § 868; Bartemeyer v. Iowa, 14 Wall. 26.
Mb. Justice Rutledge took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. Walker, 329 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1946)…plication for certiorari and have been argued here, but since we find the question of definiteness of the claim decisive of the controversy, we shall not further advert to the other contentions. This case was previously affirmed by a divided court, 326 U. S. 696, and upon petition for rehearing was restored to the docket for reargument. 327 U. S. 812. The known distance from well top to the tubing catcher is to the unknown distance from well top to the fluid surface as the time an echo requires to travel f…
-
Ernst v. Oberferst, 166 F.2d 519 (2d Cir. 1948)…ons hold, that the proceeding is a judicial one to ascertain facts according to judicial standards and subject to the usual appellate review. Cf. Twentieth Century Associates v. Waldman, 294 N.Y. 571, 63 N.E. 2d 177, 162 A.L.R. 197, appeal dismissed 326 U.S. 696, 66 S.Ct. 492, 90 L.Ed. 410; Zellner v. Brooklyn Trust Co., [*524] 270 App.Div. 941, 62 N.Y.S.2d 40. Henee we think that resort to the state court is to be dictated by considerations of wise comity, as in Thompson v. Magnolia Petroleum Co., 309 U.S.…
Authorities Cited
- Bartemeyer v. Iowa, 14 Wall. 26 (U.S. 1871)