RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION ET AL.
v.
DENVER & RIO GRANDE WESTERN RAILROAD CO. ET AL.; RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION ET AL. V. DENVER & SALT LAKE WESTERN RAILROAD CO. ET AL.; RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION ET AL. V. CITY BANK FARMERS TRUST CO., TRUSTEE, ET AL.; AND RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION ET AL. V. THOMPSON, TRUSTEE, ET AL.
RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION ET AL.
DENVER & RIO GRANDE WESTERN RAILROAD CO. ET AL.; RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION ET AL. V. DENVER & SALT LAKE WESTERN RAILROAD CO. ET AL.; RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION ET AL. V. CITY BANK FARMERS TRUST CO., TRUSTEE, ET AL.; AND RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION ET AL. V. THOMPSON, TRUSTEE, ET AL.
326 U.S. 699
Supreme Court of the United States (1945)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Reconstr. Fin. Corp. v. Denver & RIO Grande W. R.R. Co., 328 U.S. 495 (U.S. 1946)…rs on July 30, 1945, sought a writ of certiorari to reverse these rulings of the Circuit Court and, on account of the importance of the issues in the administration of railroad reorganization under § 77, we granted their petition on October 8, 1945. 326 U. S. 699. The briefs of all the parties here restate the questions presented in the petition for certiorari according to the emphasis the particular party places upon points of controversy. After a general consideration of the background of the plan and res…