UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION COMMISSION OF ALASKA ET AL.

v.

ARAGON ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Seas Shipping Co., Inc. v. Sieracki, 328 U.S. 85 (U.S. 1946)
  …n that respondent should recover for the ship's lack of seaworthiness.2 The opinion emphasized that the decision was novel, noting “statements and assumptions each way.” 3 Because of the novelty and importance of the question we granted certiorari.4 326 U. S. 700. The finding that the ship was unseaworthy is not disputed. Petitioner says, first, that the doctrine of unseaworthiness is peculiar to admiralty and cannot be applied in a suit brought on the law side of the court. It also urges that in any event…
• Soc. Sec. Bd. v. Nierotko, 327 U.S. 358 (U.S. 1946)
  …ages. On review of the Board’s decision,3 the district court upheld the Board. The circuit court of appeals reversed. 149 F. 2d 273. On account of the importance of the issues in the administration of the Social Security Act, we ¿ranted certiorari.4 326 U. S. 700; Judicial Code § 240. During the period for which “back pay” was awarded respondent the federal old age .benefits were governed by Title II of the Social Security Act of 1935. 49 Stat. 622. As Title II of the Social Security Act Amendments of. 1939…
• Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, 245 F.2d 175 (2d Cir. 1957)
  …ause of action for unseaworthiness, while available to seamen and stevedores, is not available to Kermarec who was nothing more than a licensee. The Osceola, 1903, 189 U.S. 158, 23 S.Ct. 483, 47 L.Ed. 760; Seas Shipping Co. v. [*178] Sieracki, 1945, 326 U.S. 700, 66 S.Ct. 58, 90 L.Ed. 413; Pope & Talbot v. Hawn, supra. Kermarec did not make any contribution to the ship’s safety, preservation or progress; he did not submit his life and safety to the ship as a seaman does; he did not load her for voyage as a…