CHERRY COTTON MILLS, INC.
v.
UNITED STATES
CHERRY COTTON MILLS, INC.
UNITED STATES
326 U.S. 705
Supreme Court of the United States (1945)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. Walker, 329 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1946)…by us in General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp., 304 U. S. 364.2 This statutory requirement of distinctness and certainty in claims is important in patent law. We granted certiorari to consider whether it was correctly applied in this case. 326 U. S. 705.3 The patent in suit was sustained as embodying an improvement over a past patent of Lehr and Wyatt (No. 2,047,974) upon an apparatus designed to facilitate the pumping of oil out of wells which do not have sufficient natural pressures to force the…
-
Griffin v. Griffin, 327 U.S. 220 (U.S. 1946)…the New York supreme court to which we have referred, the district court ordered summary judgment in the sum of $25,382.75, with interest from February 23, 1938. The court of appeals for the District affirmed without opinion. We granted certiorari, 326 U. S. 705, on a petition which urges the sufficiency of the defenses raised below. By Rule 56 (d) of the Rule's of Civil Procedure, the court, on a motion for summary judgment, is required to [*226] ascertain by examination of the pleadings and the evidence…