ASHCRAFT ET AL.

v.

TENNESSEE

Citator

Cited By

• Angel v. Bullington, 330 U.S. 183 (U.S. 1947)
  …North Carolina. Angel pleaded in bar the judgment in the North Carolina action. The District Court gave judgment for Bullington, 56 F. Supp. 372, and the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed. 150 F. 2d 679. We granted certiorari, 326 U. S. 713, because the failure [*186] to dismiss this action, on the ground that the judgment in the North Carolina court precluded the right thereafter to recover on the same cause of action in the federal court, presented an important question in the admini…
• Joseph v. Carter & Weekes Stevedoring Co., 330 U.S. 422 (U.S. 1947)
  …o the general validity of the local laws. See McGoldrick v. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co., 309 U. S. 33, and New York Rapid Transit Corp. v. City of New York, 303 U. S. 573. These cases involved other phases of these local laws. Certiorari granted, 326 U. S. 713; argued March 1, 1946; restored to the docket for reargument April 22, 1946. Local Laws of the City of New York (1940), No. 78: “§ R41-2.0. Imposition of tax. a. For the privilege of carrying on or exercising for gain or profit within the city any…
• Davidson v. Gardner (two cases), 172 F.2d 188 (7th Cir. 1949)
  …So far as we are able to discern, the only questiorrhefore the Supreme Court was whether the State court judgment was res adjudicata. The court in its opinion states 330 U.S. at page 185, 67 S.Ct. at page 659, 91 L.Ed. 832: “We granted certiorari, 326 U.S. 713, 66 S.Ct. 231 [90 L.Ed. 421], because the failure to dismiss this action, on the ground that the judgment in the North Carolina court precluded the right thereafter to recover on the same cause of action in the federal court, presented an important…