THOMAS PAPER STOCK CO. ET AL.
v.
BOWLES, PRICE ADMINISTRATOR

U.S. | 1946-01-02
No. 578
326 U.S. 715 Supreme Court of the United States (1946) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Heiser v. Woodruff, 327 U.S. 726 (U.S. 1946)
    …ruptcy should be rejected because based on a judgment procured by claimant’s fraud. The Court of Appeals accordingly remanded the cause to the district court for further proceedings on the objections to allowance of the claim. We granted certiorari, 326 U. S. 715, upon a petition which raises the questions whether the bankruptcy court may re-adjudicate the merits of a cause of action on which a judgment against [*729] the bankrupt, proved as a claim in bankruptcy, was entered and may disregard a previous adj…
  • Thomas Paper Stock Co. v. Porter, 328 U.S. 50 (U.S. 1946)
    …trator on the ground that a corrected regulation bars protest. Thomas Paper Stock Co. v. Bowles, 148 F. 2d 831. We then brought the case here as one of a series of cases raising important issues in the enforcement of the Emergency Price Control Act. 326 U. S. 715. In the meantime petitioners invoked § 204 (e) of the Act, 58 Stat. 632, 639; 50 U. S. C. App. § 924 (e), whereby they sought leave to file a complaint directly with the [*56] Emergency Court. The District Court, before which the criminal prosecuti…
    1 / 2

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw