SEMINOLE NATION

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• The Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation v. The United States, 390 F.2d 686 (Ct. Cl. 1968)
  …e surveyed and the “lieu lands” were selected from surveyed lands. It was held in the cases of Creek Nation v. United States, 302 U.S. 620, 58 S.Ct. 384, 82 L.Ed. 482 (1938), and Seminole Nation v. United States, 102 Ct.Cl. 565 (1944), cert. denied, 326 U.S. 719, 66 S.Ct. 24, 90 L.Ed. 426 (1945), that the date of taking is not the date of the statute authorizing disposition, but the date on which the lands are actually disposed of by the Federal Government. In those cases, the actual disposition was accompl…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• The Navajo Tribe of Indians v. The United States, 624 F.2d 981 (Ct. Cl. 1980)
  …roperly excepted to, and may be recovered by an Indian tribe. See, e. g., Rogue River Tribe of Indians v. United States, 105 Ct.Cl. 495, 550, 552, 64 F.Supp. 339, 343-44 (1946); Seminole Nation v. United States, 102 Ct.Cl. 565, 629-31, cert. denied, 326 U.S. 719, 66 S.Ct. 24, 90 L.Ed. 426 (1945). However, plaintiff can recover only for improper treaty expenditures to the extent that they exceed any offsets to which defendant is entitled. See, Rogue River, supra, 105 Ct.Cl. at 552, 64 F.Supp. at 343-44. See…
• Coast Indian Community v. The United States, 550 F.2d 639 (Ct. Cl. 1977)
  …United States v. Pueblo of Taos, 207 Ct.Cl. 53, 515 F. 2d 1404 (1975), United States v. Northern Paiute Nation, 490 F. 2d 954, 957-58, 203 Ct.Cl. 468, 474-75 (1974), and Seminole Nation v. United States, 102 Ct.Cl. 565, 618-20 (1944), cert. denied, 326 U.S. 719, 66 S.Ct. 24, 90 L.Ed. 426 (1945). . Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes v. United States, 401 F. 2d 785, 787-89, 185 Ct.Cl. 421, 425-28 (1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1055, 89 S.Ct. 691, 21 L.Ed.2d 696 (1969). In this case, lapse of time was als…