HALE

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Strauss v. United States, 311 F.2d 926 (5th Cir. 1963)
  …ling $86,879.91. We do not believe that this variance in proof under the circumstances prejudiced appellant. Ledbetter v. United States, 1898, 170 U.S. 606; 18 S.Ct. 774, 42 L.Ed. 1162; Hale v. United States, 5 Cir., 1945, 149 F. 2d 401, cert. den., 326 U.S. 732, 66 S.Ct. 40, 90 L.Ed. 436. Substantial similarity between the facts alleged in the overt act and those-proved is all that is required. See Berger v. United States, 1935, 295 U.S. 78, 55 S.Ct. 629, 79 L.Ed. 1314; and United States v. Tramaglino, 2 C…
• Stewart v. United States, 395 F.2d 484 (8th Cir. 1968)
  …ander v. United States, 271 F. 2d 140 (8th Cir. 1959); Berg v. United States, 176 F. 2d 122, 126 (9th Cir. 1949), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 876, 70 S.Ct. 137, 94 L.Ed. 537 (1949); Hale v. United States, 149 F. 2d 401, 403 (5th Cir. 1945), cert. denied, 326 U.S. 732, 66 S.Ct. 40, 90 L.Ed. 436 (1945). By reason of our constitutional provisions, an indictment cannot be amended in a substantial material way so as to broaden or change the charge or to prejudice an accused by failing to fully apprise him of the cha…
• Vaney Russell v. United States, 429 F.2d 237 (5th Cir. 1970)
  …tice and Procedure, § 125 at 247. See also, Ledbetter v. United States, 170 U.S. 606, 18 S.Ct. 774, 42 L.Ed. 1162 (1898); United States v. Covington, 411 F. 2d 1087 (4th Cir. 1969); Hale v. United States, 149 F. 2d 401 (5th Cir. 1945), cert. denied, 326 U.S. 732, 66 S.Ct. 40, 90 L.Ed. 436 (1945). Because time is not of the essence in connection with the crime charged here, the trial court did not err in refusing to dismiss the indictment and admitting evidence pertaining to the 1966 date. Moreover, the rec…