COSTELLO ET AL.

v.

COSTELLO ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Colonial Refrigerated Transp., Inc. v. Mitchell, 403 F.2d 541 (5th Cir. 1968)
  …1046. . Rule 61, Fed.Rules Civ.Pro. See, e. g., Morley Const. Co. v. Maryland Cas. Co., 1937, 300 U.S. 185, 57 S.Ct. 325, 81 L.Ed. 593; Ex parte Genecov, 1945, 143 Tex. 476, 186 S.W. 2d 225, 160 A.L.R. 1099, cert. denied, Genecov v. State of Texas, 326 U.S. 733, 66 S.Ct. 41, 90 L.Ed. 436. . Raborn v. Hayton, 34 Wash.2d 105, 208 P. 2d 133 (1949). 6 Wigmore, Evidence §§ 1714, 1715, 1725-40. Hinton, States of Mind and the Hearsay Rule, 1 U.Ch.L.Rev. 394 (1934). . Williams v. United States, 199 F. 2d 921 (5…
• Est. of Jerome Mittleman v. Commissioner OF Internal Revenue, 522 F.2d 132 (D.C. Cir. 1975)
  …In re Estate of Kerr, 139 U.S.App.D.C. 321, 331-332, 433 F. 2d 479, 489-490 (1970); Hyman v. District of Columbia, 101 U.S.App.D.C. 179, 182, 247 F. 2d 585, 588 (1957); Costello v. Costello, 80 U.S.App.D.C. 75, 76, 149 F. 2d 379, 380, cert. denied, 326 U.S. 733, 66 S.Ct. 41, 90 L.Ed. 436 (1945). . 26 C.F.R. § 20.2056(b)-5(e) (1975) provides: Application of local law. In determining whether or not the conditions set forth in paragraph (a)(1) through (5) of this section are satisfied by the instrument of t…