ARUNDEL CORPORATION

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Samora v. United States, 406 F.2d 1095 (5th Cir. 1969)
  …S. 304, 57 S.Ct. 216, 81 L.Ed. 255 (1936). We conclude that the policy is sufficiently defined and the standards sufficiently definite that the delegation by § 1934 is constitutional. United States v. Rosenberg, 150 F. 2d 788 (2d Cir.) cert. denied 326 U.S. 752, 66 S.Ct. 90, 90 L.Ed. 451 (1945); Zemel v. Rusk, supra; United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corporation, supra; United States v. Bareno, 50 F.Supp. 520 (D.Md.1943). See also, Randall v. United States, 148 F. 2d 234 (5th Cir.) cert. denied 325 U.…
• Hardeman-Monier-Hutcherson v. The United States, 458 F.2d 1364 (Ct. Cl. 1972)
  …Contracting Co., Inc., ASBCA No. 7267, 1962 BCA ¶ 3325; Keflavik Contractors, ASBCA No. 6387, 61-2 BCA ¶ 3161; Koeneke and Latimer, ASBCA No. 3163, 57-1 BCA ¶ 1313; Arundel Corporation v. United States, [3 CCF 605] 103 Ct.Cl. 688 (1945), cert. den. 326 U.S. 752 [66 S.Ct. 90, 90 L.Ed. 451]; The Government Contractor, Briefing Paper No. 65-4, August 1965. Such natural occurrences as tidal currents and ocean swells would fall within this rule. The sea conditions at Point Murat resulted from wind, swells, and…
• Tombigbee Constructors v. The United States, 420 F.2d 1037 (Ct. Cl. 1970)
  …party to a contract is responsible to the other for the damages caused by an act of God; where the contract is silent as to the allocation of the loss to one or the other party. Arundel Corp. v. United States, 103 Ct.Cl. 688, 711-712, cert. denied, 326 U.S. 752, 66 S.Ct. 90, 90 L.Ed. 451 (1945). Under the contract, the flood entitled plaintiff only to an extension of time, and he received such an extension. There is accordingly no basis for shifting to the Government the loss caused to plaintiff by the ra…