MAS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Osborn v. Sinclair Ref. Co., 286 F.2d 832 (4th Cir. 1960)
  …o use competing products in like machines obtained elsewhere. See: Signode Steel Strapping Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, 4 Cir., 1942, 132 F. 2d 48; Judson L. Thomson Mfg. Co. v. Federal Trade Comm., 1 Cir., 1945, 150 F. 2d 952, certiorari denied 326 U.S. 776, 66 S.Ct. 267, 90 L.Ed. 469. A tying agreement is defined as “an agreement by a party to sell one product but only on the condition that the buyer also purchase a different (or tied) product, or at least agrees that he will not purchase that produc…
• United States v. Kilcullen, 546 F.2d 435 (1st Cir. 1976)
  …ft No. 10, 1960) (arguing knowledge not necessary); Developments in the Law— Criminal Conspiracy, 72 Harv.L.Rev. 920, 937-39 (1959) (criticizing rule requiring knowledge); cf. McGunnigal v. United States, 151 F. 2d 162, 165 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 326 U.S. 776, 66 S.Ct. 267, 90 L.Ed. 469 (1945) (problem mentioned but not confronted). See also Screws v. United States, 325 U.S. 91, 106, 65 S.Ct. 1031, 89 L.Ed. 1495 (1945); In re Coy, 127 U.S. 731, 762-63, 8 S.Ct. 1263, 32 L.Ed. 274 (1888) (Field, J., diss…
• Harney v. United States, 306 F.2d 523 (1st Cir. 1962)
  …hat has been shown, for the thrust of the fraudulent scheme alleged and proved to the jury’s satisfaction • was directed against and would expend itself on the federal fisc. See McGunnigal v. United States, 151 F. 2d 162 (C.A.1, 1945), cert. denied, 326 U.S. 776, 66 S.Ct. 267, 90 L.Ed. 469 (1945). [*532] We come now to the question whether extensive adverse publicity deprived the appellants of a fair trial or at least required the court below in the sound exercise of its discretion to grant a continuance.4…